• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Though there has been an increase in the prices in the last six months, Bitcoin stood as an asset because of its market volatility. Therefore, there was not an issue which to select and that is where the money is made. Since the money was in the form of loans rather than income, he wasn't obliged to pay taxes on it. If widely deployed, package relay would allow users who create transactions a long time before broadcasting them (e.g. timelocked transactions or LN commitment transactions) to safely pay the minimum possible fee. When it came time to broadcast the transaction, they could use Child-Pays-For-Parent (CPFP) fee bumping to set an appropriate fee for the current network conditions. This is the maximum amount of time a new payment can be stuck as pending before it can be reclaimed by its spender. 64 where LND could only be upgraded from a maximum of one major release back. 3595 raises the default maximum CLTV expiry from 1,008 blocks (about 1 week) to 2,016 blocks (about two weeks). RedGrittyBrick and Murch explain that a transaction’s inclusion in an invalid block does not have any impact on the validity of that transaction or its ability to be confirmed in subsequent blocks.

Pieter Wuille clarifies that since 0.10.0, Bitcoin Core uses headers-first IBD (initial block download) which eliminates the possibility of orphan blocks (as defined by the questioner). The storage amount was originally chosen (pre-segwit) to keep 288 blocks worth of state transition data, about two days worth, on disk. ● Why was 550 (MiB) chosen as a minimum storage size for prune mode? ● Tapscript resource limits: youtu.be the bip-tapscript proposal limits transactions to one signature-checking operation (sigop) for every 12.5 vbytes the witness data adds to the size of the transaction (plus one free sigop per input). Carve-out transactions are allowed to slightly exceed Bitcoin Core’s limits on transaction size and number of ancestors. In a mailing list post, bip-tapscript author Pieter Wuille notes that he and Andrew Poelstra examined other resource limits on scripts that were put in place to prevent nodes from using an excessive amount of CPU or memory during verification.

This week’s newsletter requests feedback on not allowing P2SH-wrapped addresses for taproot, describes proposed changes to script resource limits in tapscript, and mentions a discussion about watchtower storage costs. This week’s newsletter describes a demo implementation of eltoo and several discussions related to it, requests comments on limiting the normal number of LN gossip updates to one per day, and provides our longest-to-date list of notable changes to popular Bitcoin infrastructure projects. This week’s newsletter relays a security announcement for LN implementations, describes a non-interactive coinjoin proposal, and notes a few changes in popular Bitcoin infrastructure projects. Bitcoin vs gold will be a big debate in the coming few years. Other than a slightly different layout, the Binance exchange Advanced view is identical to the Basic view with a few more TA bells and whistles. With this PR, RBF fee bumping of the carve-out is now possible, making it an even more useful tool for fee management of settlement transactions in two-party LN payment channels. If you use services like Twitter, you can even list your Bitcoin address to get tips or donations. By clicking on that link, you’ll get two options to ensure the security of your account - the authenticator app and mobile SMS.

My buddy Tom explained how to set up a pooled mining account so I thought it would be interesting to share the instructions. 15450 allows users to create new wallets for multiwallet mode from the GUI, completing a set of GUI actions that also allows users to load and unload wallets. Because signatures are expected to be 16.0 vbytes, this limit prevents abuse without affecting normal users. ● Upgrade LN implementations: one or more issues that are scheduled to be disclosed at the end of this month affect older LN implementations. ● How do orphan blocks affect the network? ● What happens to transactions included in invalid blocks? Only announcing blocks minimizes the bandwidth and memory overhead of the new connections and makes it much more difficult for an adversary to map the connections between nodes. An adversary that can map all of a node’s connections can attack that node, either by identifying which transactions originate from that node (a privacy leak) or by isolating the node from the rest of the network (potentially making theft of funds from the node possible).