• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was operating smooth on a similar stack with very few servers (when you think about the site visitors).When you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the only ones needing it, but they noticed an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one thing bleeding is my eyes once i see something that could possibly be wiped up in a standard PHP/Python/Ruby stack but instead is made with so many dependencies and third social gathering library that you wonder if the dude who wrote it really is aware of programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller gamers are often utilizing outdated stuff, then once more 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps undoubtedly are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, just that most tend to not buy the hype.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time may help us to grasp whether we are truly able to live in the world we're making. Speculative fiction fans know which you could create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is nearly precisely the same; that’s why invention is a danger. After we create something new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it will have on the planet wherein it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally means that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill laptop, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological development supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And regardless that anyone excited about a tablet had most likely been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one factor that really ready the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cell computing is one prepared for a bridge gadget between a small mobile display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which might be commonplace right this moment made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t fairly prepared they usually weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or really successful one; the iPod really ought to get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, each main tech company is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the actual first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gas powered automobile vehicle introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and xhamster in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental thought of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us had been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would force us right into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the first public video name from Washington, D.C.