• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was working smooth on an identical stack with very few servers (when you think about the visitors).In case you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the one ones needing it, but they noticed a possibility to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only factor bleeding is my eyes after i see something that may very well be wiped up in a normal PHP/Python/Ruby stack however as an alternative is made with so many dependencies and third get together library that you surprise if the dude who wrote it truly knows programming or if he simply glued cool techs collectively as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller gamers are normally using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress continues to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps undoubtedly are aware of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that the majority tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that were forward of their time can help us to understand whether or not we are truly ready to dwell on this planet we're making. Speculative fiction followers know you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is almost precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. Once we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it will have on the earth wherein it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that often means that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It might be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, despite the fact that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And regardless that anybody all in favour of a tablet had most likely been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that actually prepared the world for the pill laptop was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world wherein over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one prepared for a bridge system between a small mobile display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which can be commonplace right now made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, but as a result of the world wasn’t quite prepared they usually weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and xnxx controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report told us all to anticipate them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the first actually good or really profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to only weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick death after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, each major tech firm is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in reality, like the actual first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gasoline powered automobile car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the fundamentals of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The basic idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.