• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Inventions that have been ahead of their time may help us to know whether or not we're truly ready to dwell on the planet we're making. Speculative fiction fans know that you would be able to create a complete world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere facets that characterize a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the true world is sort of exactly the same; that’s why invention is a threat. Once we create one thing new - actually, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it could have on the planet in which it emerges and the power it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill laptop, though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological development offered better hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anybody keen on a pill had most likely been ready for porn one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that basically ready the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world through which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge device between a small cellular screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, after all, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which are commonplace today made their debuts in products that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite ready and so they weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report told us all to count on them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, in fact; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually successful one; the iPod really should get the credit for that. But, it did threat its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast death after a widely known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.

But virtually a decade later, every main tech firm is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in reality, like the actual first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the first gasoline powered vehicle automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The basic idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.

New York City. This early system used a closed circuit system, but within just a few decades, Bell Labs managed to create equipment that would make use of the country’s existing phone strains. That is what Bell Telephone announced to the world at the 1964 World’s Fair, the PicturePhone. By that time, it was ready for hype, but not use. It took a few extra years of anticipation-constructing for Bell Telephone to get their product ready. But they didn’t hold again on their advertising. In one of the improbable examples of product placement in cinema of all time, Bell Telephone was prominently featured in a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: An area Odyssey in 1969. That was Bell’s means of claiming, give us thirty years or so - not only will you be PicturePhoning cross-country, you’ll be calling area, too! A year later, the PicturePhone was demonstrated in public. The first name using the first consumer-ready PicturePhone was made by the Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the chairman of Alcoa, one of the city’s most important manufacturers.