• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Law

Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare provider is not adhering to the accepted standards of care. However, not all mistakes or injuries that result from treatment are medical malpractice lawyers malpractice that is compensable.

A physician has an obligation to exercise reasonable care and competence when treating his patients. Medical malpractice lawsuits that claim a failure to provide reasonable care and expertise can be stressful for doctors.

Duty of Care

When a doctor treats a patient the patient, it is his or their responsibility to treat the patient in accordance with the medical standard of care. This is the level of care and expertise that a doctor trained in the specific area of medicine would provide in similar circumstances. A breach of duty is medical malpractice.

To prove that a doctor breached their duty, the injured patient must prove that the doctor failed to treat them in accordance with the standard of care. The patient must also prove that the failure directly led to their injury. The standard of proof in civil cases is less stringent than "beyond reasonable doubt" which is required in criminal trials. It is called the preponderance standard.

The patient who was injured must show that they suffered damages due to the doctor's negligence. Damages can be a result of past and future medical expenses as well as lost income, pain, suffering, and loss of consortium.

Medical malpractice lawsuits can take considerable time and resources to pursue. Legal discovery and negotiation can take years to resolve these cases. In the end the pursuit of these cases requires an investment by both physicians and their attorneys. Some plaintiffs are required to pay for expert witness testimony and trial costs can be high.

Causation

If you want to bring a claim against a medical negligence, your Rochester hospital malpractice lawyer must show that not just did the defendant breach his or her obligation and that the breach also caused you to suffer. The case will fail if you don't have enough evidence against the doctor.

In the case of medical malpractice, proving causation can be more difficult than in other cases, like motor car accidents. In a car crash it's generally easy to prove that Jack's actions caused the injuries of Tina. This is the case for property damage as well as physical pain. In a medical malpractice case the court will usually require you to present expert medical evidence in order to prove that your injury was caused by the breach of duty.

This element is referred to as "proximate causation" and essentially means that the defendant has caused your injury, and not another cause. This is a difficult task because, in many cases, there are multiple causes for your injury which occur at the same time. For example, the accident could be caused by an obscenely massive truck or poor road design. Medical experts will be required to determine which of these causes caused your injuries.

Damages

A medical malpractice case is when a medical professional or health care professional fails to care for a patient in accordance with the accepted standards of practice in the medical profession, and that failure causes an injury, illness or condition to get worse. The person who was injured could be entitled to compensation for their losses, including loss of income, expense such as pain and suffering loss of enjoyment of life, and other non-economic and economic loss.

The law has a doctrine known as "res-ipsa-loquitur," which is Latin for "the thing itself speaks." In some cases medical malpractice, it is so obvious and flagrant that it's apparent to anyone who is logical. For example, a doctor performs surgery on a patient and then leaves a clamp in the body of the patient or a surgeon cuts off a vein that wasn't intended to be cut. These kinds of cases are not easy to be won, however, as the jury must bridge the gap between familiarity with the subject and the specialized knowledge and experience required to determine if the defendant was negligent.

As with any other legal claim there is a specific time limit within which a medical malpractice case must be filed. This time period is known as the statute of limitation. The statute of limitations is activated on the date the date that the plaintiff learns or is believed to have known, that they have been injured by the alleged medical malpractice.

Representation

In the United States, medical malpractice claims are generally resolved in state trial courts. The legal authority for such cases differs based on the jurisdiction. To prevail in a case, the plaintiff must prove that the doctor's negligence caused injury or death. This requires establishing four elements or legal requirements, for example the duty of care owed by a doctor care; a breach of this duty; a causal relationship between the alleged negligence and injury; and the existence of monetary damages that flow from the injury.

When a patient asserts that a physician committed malpractice the lawsuit may require a long period of discovery. This involves the exchange of documents and written interrogatories, and depositions. Depositions of doctors and other witnesses are formal proceedings in which they are questioned under oath by opposing counsel, and recorded for use in the court at a later date.

Due to the complexity and intricacy surrounding medical malpractice law, you should consult with an New York malpractice attorney who can explain the law and your particular case. Furthermore, it is imperative that your attorney file your claim within the statute of limitations that varies by jurisdiction. If you do not, it will stop you from obtaining the financial compensation you are entitled to. Furthermore, it could keep you from pursuing punitive damages which are reserved by the courts for especially egregious conduct that society has a keen interest in retributing.