• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical malpractice lawsuits can be complicated and time-consuming. It is also expensive for both the plaintiff as well as the defendant.

In order to win monetary compensation in a malpractice lawsuit, an injured patient must show that substandard medical treatment led to injury. This requires establishing four legal elements: a professional duty and breach of duty as well as injury and damages.

Discovery

The most important aspect of a case involving medical negligence is gathering evidence. This can be done via written interrogatories, or requests for documents. Interrogatories require to be answered under the oath of the party opposing to the lawsuit. They can be used to establish the facts to be used in trial. Demands for the production of documents permit tangible documents to be obtained, such as medical records or test results.

In many cases your attorney will record the deposition of the defendant physician and witness, which is a recorded session of questions and answers. This allows your lawyer to ask the physician or witnesses questions that would not be allowed at trial. It can be extremely efficient in cases involving expert witnesses.

The information gathered during discovery before trial will be used to prove your claim in court.

Infraction to the standard of care

Injuries that result from a violation of the standard care

Proximate causation

A doctor's failure to use the level of competence and expertise of physicians in their field of specialization, and which proximately resulted in injury to the patient

Mediation

Medical malpractice trials are essential, but they also have numerous disadvantages. For plaintiffs the pressure, cost and the commitment to trial can have a negative psychological impact on them. For defendant health care professionals trial may cause humiliation and loss of prestige. It can also have adverse impacts on their professional career and practice because the monetary payments they receive as part of settlements before trial are reported to national databases for practitioners and the state medical licensing board, and medical societies.

Mediation is the most cost-effective, efficient, and risk-free method of settling the medical malpractice case. The cost of trial and avoiding loss of jury verdicts, mediation allows both parties to be more flexible in their settlement negotiations.

Each side must submit brief details of the situation to the mediator before mediation (a "mediation short"). In this stage, parties will usually communicate through their lawyer, and not directly. Direct communication could be used as evidence against them in court. When the mediation process is in progress it's best to focus on your case's strengths, and be willing to admit its weaknesses. This will enable the mediator to solve any gaps in understanding and provide you with an acceptable offer.

Trial

Tort reformers aim to create a system that will compensate those hurt by negligence caused by doctors quickly and without a lot of expense. While this isn't easy some states have enacted tort reforms to reduce costs and prevent frivolous medical malpractice claims.

The majority of doctors in the United States have malpractice insurance as a way to protect themselves from accusations of professional negligence. Certain of these policies are required to be carried out as a condition of hospital privileges or employment within a medical company.

To be eligible for an amount of money for injuries sustained by negligence of a medical professional, the victim must prove that the doctor did not meet the applicable standard of care in the area of expertise he or she practices. This concept is known as proximate causation and is an important part of a medical malpractice claim.

A lawsuit starts by filing a civil summons and complaint in the court of your choice. After this is done each party must participate in an exchange of information. This can include written interrogatories as well as the production of documents, such a medical records. Depositions (in which attorneys ask deponents under the oath) as well as requests for admission are also involved.

The burden of proof in the case of medical malpractice is extremely high, and the damages awarded are calculated based on the actual economic loss such as lost earnings and the cost of future medical care as well as non-economic losses, such suffering and pain. It is crucial to consult with an experienced attorney when you are pursuing a medical negligence claim.

Settlement

Settlements are the most common way to settle medical malpractice lawsuits. In general, the actual dollar value of a case is negotiated between the plaintiff and the defendants (often through or alongside the defendant's malpractice/professional liability insurer). The victim is awarded an amount of money that is then paid to the plaintiff's lawyer, who then deposits it into an escrow account. The lawyer deducts legal fees and costs in accordance with the representation agreement. Then, he provides the injured victims with compensation.

To prevail in a medical malpractice lawsuit the plaintiff must demonstrate that a physician or other healthcare provider breached their duty of care by failing to demonstrate the required level of expertise and skills in their field. They must also show that the victim suffered injury due to the violation.

In the United States, there are 94 federal district court systems which are equivalent to state trial courts. Each of these courts has an ad-hoc jury and judge panel that decides cases. In certain circumstances cases, medical negligence may be transferred to one of these federal district courts. In the United States, physicians carry medical malpractice law firms malpractice insurance to safeguard themselves against lawsuits for harm caused by negligence. Medical professionals should be aware of the nature and workings of the legal system so that they can be able to react appropriately to a lawsuit brought against them.